When billionaires Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer threw
their names in the hat for the Democratic nomination for president of the
United States, most probably expected they would spend some of their own money
in the pursuit of the nomination. But
few expected how they would bury the race in their own money. To date, Steyer and Bloomberg have each spent
nearly $200 million, each more than double Democratic contender Bernie Sanders,
and each more than three times Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden. All that money doesn’t seem to have done much
for Tom Steyer, but Bloomberg’s omnipresent advertising in critical markets has
propelled him higher in the polls steadily.
(Chart from Marketwatch.com)
Womack Weekly Commentary September 18, 2017 The Markets “In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.” Yogi Berra was talking about baseball, but the concept also applies to diversification, according to the GMO White Paper, The S&P 500: Just Say No . From the title, you might think the authors – Matt Kadnar and James Montier – don’t like U.S. stocks. They do: “Being a U.S. equity investor over the past several years has felt glorious. The S&P 500 has trounced the competition provided by other major developed and emerging equity markets. Over the last 7 years, the S&P is up 173 percent (15 percent annualized in nominal terms) versus MSCI EAFE (in USD terms), which is up 71 percent (8 percent annualized), and poor MSCI Emerging, which is up only 30 percent (4 percent annualized). Every dollar invested in the S&P has compounded into $2.72 versus MSCI EAFE’s $1.70 and MSCI Emerging’s $1.30.” The au
Comments
Post a Comment